We all know it doesn't exist, and we all know it can't for everybody has different levels of idealism. For a religious person it may be a world where everybody is in complete harmony with what have been written in the BOOKs, for a atheist it may be the end of everything she considers irrational. For a communist it may have a different meaning and for a socialist some other, so how can we have an ideal world then, does this notion really exist or is just an hypothetical experimental arbitration like we do when we consider gas molecules perfectly elastic while dealing with their simple kinetics................
I never thought about it that way, rather I will say an ideal world for anybody will be the world where she feels and 'I emphasize on FEELs' that each and every of her dream is meant to be true, that her perception has been given highest priority from the Universe, that irrespective of what others' perception is, her perception is what suits her and exists for her.
And that's when I can say that peace has born out of anarchy, a perfect harmony :)
I never thought about it that way, rather I will say an ideal world for anybody will be the world where she feels and 'I emphasize on FEELs' that each and every of her dream is meant to be true, that her perception has been given highest priority from the Universe, that irrespective of what others' perception is, her perception is what suits her and exists for her.
And that's when I can say that peace has born out of anarchy, a perfect harmony :)